The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC delivers with the death penalty because the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender might be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends around the specifics of every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive piece of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the wider legal principles.
Petitioner acquiring been declared an absconder in this case for over one particular plus a fifty percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may possibly avoid standing trial and consequently delay the prosecution on the case. The material on record makes the case of the petitioner falls under two exceptions on the rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.
The Court considered the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Considering that the danger and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
after release from the jail he misplaced interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.
Case legislation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation of your Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is important for interpreting statutes and predicting legal outcomes. Free access to those resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively founded now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority might if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears case law on mutation of fork out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
This section specifically applies to civil servants who're rendered surplus mainly because of the reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are usually not issue for the provisions on the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not use to non-civil servants. Read more